Referência: IP/06/1853
Data: 20/12/2006
A Comissão Europeia decidiu que a Espanha violou o art. 21.º do Regulamento Comunitário das Concentrações, que confere à Comissão Europeia a exclusiva competência de analisar as operações de concentração de dimensão comunitária, na medida em que impôs certas condições, à empresa energética alemã E.ON para que esta pudesse assumir o controlo da empresa espanhola Endesa, contrárias ao direito comunitário. Esta decisão da Comissão refere-se em particular às novas condições impostas por decisão de 3 de Novembro de 2006, adoptadas no quadro de um recurso administrativo contra uma decisão prévia do regulador de energia espanhol, a CNE (semelhante à nossa ERSE). A Comissão exige agora que Espanha retire as condições ilegais até 19 de Janeiro de 2007.
A Comissão Europeia está fortemente empenhada em lutar contra os proteccionismos nacionais e contra os "campeões nacionais" (empresas nacionais, muitas vezes monopolistas, que os governos nacionais tendem a proteger e a apoiar) - principalmente quando há uma distorção do direito comunitário -, como atestam as palavras da Comissária, responsável pela pasta da Concorrência, Neelie Kroes: “I regret that the Commission has once again been obliged to intervene to avoid that a Member State places unjustified conditions on a major European takeover. No one should doubt the Commission's commitment to ensuring Europe's businesses can operate on a level playing field to the benefit of Europe's consumers, businesses and the economy as a whole”.
The Commission has declared incompatible with EC law the modified conditions imposed by the Spanish Minister of Industry, Tourism and Trade requiring that:
1. Endesa maintains its brand for a five years period;
2. the companies owning electricity assets outside mainland Spain are kept within the Endesa Group for a period of 5 years;
3. Endesa’s power plants using domestic coal continue to use such an energy source as foreseen in the national mining plans;
4. E.ON does not adopt strategic decisions, regarding Endesa and affecting security of supply, contrary to the Spanish legal order.
The Commission considers that these modified conditions are incompatible the EC Treaty’s rules on free movement of capital (Article 56) and on freedom of establishment (Article 43). The condition on the use of domestic coal is also incompatible with the EC Treaty's rules on free movement of goods (Articles 28).
The Commission has exercised its discretion not to adopt, at this stage, a negative decision on the modified conditions requiring that any acquisition of stakes in Endesa’s share capital should be subject to the applicable rules of the Spanish legal system and that Endesa fulfils all existing obligations concerning the management of nuclear power plants. The modified conditions at issue do not impose any additional obligation which is not already foreseen by the general Spanish legislation and the Spanish authorities have given explicit assurances that the conditional authorisation granted to E.ON could not be revoked in case of violation thereof.
Finally, the Commission has taken note that the Spanish Minister has not modified, but merely clarified, the condition imposed by CNE with regard to gas supply requirements.
Previous Commission decision
On 26 September 2006, the Commission adopted a decision by which it declared that the decision of CNE of 27th July 2006, subjecting E.ON’s bid for Endesa to a number of conditions breached Article 21 of the EC Merger Regulation (see
IP/06/1265).
The Commission’s assessment of the conditions imposed by CNE remains valid in so far as the decision by the Spanish Minister has not modified – or has only slightly modified – the CNE's decision. In the framework of an on-going infringement procedure pursuant to Article 226 EC (see
IP/06/1426), the Commission is evaluating whether the Spanish authorities complied with its decision of 26 September 2006.
Today's decision concerns only the compatibility with Article 21 of the Merger Regulation of the substantially modified conditions imposed by the Minister’s 3rd November decision.
Next steps
The Spanish authorities have until 19 January 2007 to withdraw the modified conditions declared incompatible with EC law by today's decision. If they failed to do so, the Commission could open infringement proceedingss under Article 226 of the EC Treaty.
Background
Under Article 21 of the EU Merger Regulation, the Commission has exclusive competence to assess the competitive impact of concentrations with a Community dimension. Member States cannot apply their national competition law to such operations. Moreover, Member States cannot adopt measures which could prohibit or prejudice (de jure or de facto) such concentrations unless the measures in question:
1. protect interests other than competition and
2. are necessary and proportionate to protect interests which are compatible with all aspects of Community law.
Public security, plurality of media and prudential rules are interests that are recognised by the Merger Regulation as being legitimate, but specific measures must still be proportionate and fully compatible with all aspects of Community law.
The European Commission approved on 25th April 2006 under the EU Merger Regulation the acquisition by E.ON of sole control of Endesa (see
IP/06/528). After examining the operation, the Commission concluded that the proposed transaction would not significantly impede effective competition in the European Economic Area (EEA) or any substantial part of it.
